The Intake Rescue Playbook: Fixing the Hidden Leak in Law Firm Marketing

Partners review the numbers and ask the obvious question: "If visibility is up, why aren't consultations and retained clients following?" The answer is rarely in the marketing itself. It's in the handoff. Marketing succeeds in generating interest—but the intake system fails to capture it.

Share This Post

The Silent Threat Beneath Your Marketing Wins

The Hidden Leak No One Talks About

Every year, law firms invest in new websites, SEO campaigns, paid advertising, and reputation management. Traffic rises. Rankings improve. The marketing reports look encouraging.

And yet—growth stays flat.

Partners review the numbers and ask the obvious question: “If visibility is up, why aren’t consultations and retained clients following?”

The answer is rarely in the marketing itself. It’s in the handoff.

For many firms, the real leak lies quietly within the intake process: missed calls, slow responses, outdated forms, unclear next steps, and unstructured follow-up. Marketing succeeds in generating interest—but the intake system fails to capture it.

This is the quietest and most expensive leak inside most firms. And it explains why so many partners feel trapped in what might be called the “Intake Paradox”—marketing performance rising while revenue and consultation volume stay stubbornly flat.

The biggest leak isn’t our traffic. It’s our response.

Why Intake Performance Is Now a Direct Ranking, Trust, and Revenue Signal

Intake has always mattered. But entering 2026, it matters differently.

Google’s Local Services Ads now factor responsiveness into visibility. Your Google Business Profile engagement—calls answered, messages returned, reviews responded to—directly influences local search rankings. Whitespark’s analysis of Google’s leaked API documentation confirms what many suspected: user behavior on your profile is a major ranking factor.

Meanwhile, consumer expectations have undergone a dramatic shift. BrightLocal’s 2025 research shows that 63% of consumers expect businesses to respond to reviews within two to seven days. CallRail’s consumer survey found that 78% of people have abandoned a business after an unanswered call.

For law firms, this convergence means intake is no longer an administrative task. It’s a revenue system—one that directly affects both your visibility and your conversion rate.

The firms that understand this distinction are pulling ahead. Those that don’t are watching their marketing investments evaporate before a single consultation gets scheduled.

Where Law Firm Intake Breaks (Even When Marketing Wins)

The Real Leak: Missed, Delayed, or Mishandled First Contact

Almost every firm believes its intake is “fine”—until someone runs a mystery shop.

The results are often uncomfortable. Calls go to voicemail. Forms route to outdated inboxes or spam folders. Text messages sit unanswered for hours. Chat features go unmonitored. After-hours inquiries disappear entirely.

The data on this problem is sobering. Industry research shows that 30–48% of calls to law firms go unanswered. A 2024 analysis of firms’ first impressions found that only about one-third replied to email inquiries—and overall response performance was worse than five years prior.

Because these failures are largely invisible to partners, firms often misdiagnose the problem as “bad leads” or “ineffective marketing.” The truth is usually simpler: prospects aren’t being responded to quickly or consistently enough.

And the consequences compound silently. Every missed inquiry erodes the ROI of your paid ads. Every delayed response weakens trust before you’ve had a chance to build it. Every unstructured intake conversation reduces conversions.

When intake performance goes unmeasured, revenue quietly slips out the back door.

"Speed-to-Lead" Expectations in 2025–2026

The modern client expectation is unambiguous: fast matters.

Research indicates that 42% of potential clients hire the first lawyer who responds to their inquiry. Not the most qualified. Not the most experienced. The first one who answer.

Today’s consumers equate response speed with professionalism. The firm that responds within minutes—not hours—wins the client’s trust and the initial consultation.

Intake isn’t separate from sales. It’s the foundation of sales.

Sirus Digital Tweet

Most firms don’t operate at this standard. Not because they don’t care, but because their systems weren’t designed for it. They rely on voicemail as the default safety net. Response ownership is unclear across roles. Tools are fragmented. No service-level agreements exist for response times. After-hours coverage is minimal or nonexistent.

The gap between consumer expectations and firm performance widens every year. And in urgent practice areas like bankruptcy and consumer financial matters, “first to respond” is effectively “first to retain.”

Common Failure Patterns

Across small and mid-sized firms, the same patterns repeat with remarkable consistency:

Online forms that route to inboxes no one checks.
Intake emails that land in spam.
No structured triage process to prioritize high-intent inquiries.
No CRM-driven workflows to ensure consistent follow-up.
No intake scripts that guide staff through qualification and next steps.
After-hours dead zones where every lead is simply lost.

These issues compound slowly—until growth stalls and acquisition costs balloon. Partners wonder why marketing isn’t working when the real problem is that marketing is working fine. The intake system just isn’t catching what marketing generates.

For additional info on improving your Law Firm Marketing processes (especially as it relates to content), check out this related post detailing how Google evaluates Legal websites.

Impacts If Unresolved — What This Leak Costs a Firm

Direct Revenue Losses

A missed call isn’t an inconvenience. It’s a lost client.

Consider the math for a small estate planning or bankruptcy firm. If your firm generates 100 inbound leads per month through various channels, and you miss 35% of calls and inquiries—a rate consistent with industry benchmarks—you’re losing approximately 35 potential clients monthly before any conversation happens.

If even half of those could have become attended consultations, and half of those would have retained your services, you’re looking at eight to nine lost clients every month. At an average case value of $3,000–$5,000, that’s $24,000–$45,000 in potential revenue leaking away—before considering referrals or lifetime value.

For bankruptcy firms, where urgency and competition are intense, the effective “winner-takes-most” dynamic means the first firm to answer grabs a disproportionate share of that value.

Small leaks become large losses. And they’re often invisible until someone finally measures them.

Wasted Marketing Spend

Marketing teams generate leads. Intake determines whether those leads become clients.

When intake fails, the symptoms look like marketing problems. Ads appear “ineffective.” SEO seems “slow to produce results.” Referrals “drop off” without explanation. Partners grow skeptical of their marketing investments because the connection between spend and results feels broken.

But often the leads are there—the intake system simply isn’t catching them.

Modern marketing doesn’t outperform bad intake. It magnifies its costs.

Sirus Digital Tweet

Poor responsiveness can also reduce visibility in Local Service Ads and Google Business Profiles, creating a compounding problem. As of mid-2025, Google Local Services Ads can penalize accounts with inconsistent contact data or poor intake responsiveness.

Firms have been downgraded or suspended for repeated failures to answer inquiries in a timely fashion.

When your intake performance affects your ad delivery, every marketing dollar has to work harder just to maintain the same results.

Erosion of Trust and Reputation

Prospective clients draw quick conclusions when their calls aren’t answered or their messages go unreturned.

“If they’re too busy—or too disorganized—to answer now, how will they treat me when I’m actually their client?”

It’s a reasonable inference, and it shapes decisions. BrightLocal’s research shows that reviews referencing responsiveness (or lack thereof) significantly influence conversion rates. Unanswered calls and slow responses affect not just individual conversions, but word-of-mouth referrals and overall perception of professionalism.

In practice areas built on trust—estate planning, elder law, bankruptcy, financial services—first impressions carry outsized weight. A fumbled intake experience can undo months of reputation-building content and careful brand positioning.

Operational Bottlenecks

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Beyond marketing performance, intake problems spill into operations.

Incomplete client data creates downstream confusion. Frustrated staff lose time tracking down missing information. Workflows become cluttered with partial records. Scheduling delays frustrate both prospects and attorneys. Inconsistent qualification leads to consultations with poorly matched clients.

Left unresolved, intake becomes a bottleneck for the entire firm—not just the marketing function.

Deep-Dive Diagnosis — Why Intake Fails in Small and Mid-Sized Firms

Structural Flaws

Most firms don’t assign clear ownership to intake as a business function.

Responsibilities bounce between receptionists, paralegals, attorneys, and office managers without defined accountability. No one owns the process end-to-end. No one tracks performance metrics. No one is responsible for continuous improvement.

This creates gaps, delays, and inconsistent experiences that cost firms clients. Clio’s 2024 Legal Trends Report notes that firms devote significant time to low-value tasks while clients wait for responses—a structural problem that better systems could address.

Wisconsin State Bar materials put it bluntly: poor intake leads to wasted time and lost revenue. Firms spend 5–10% of annual revenue on business development, yet often lack a coherent process for converting those inquiries into paying clients.

Technology Gaps

Modern firms need centralized CRMs, automated routing, digitized forms, and integrated call/text/chat tracking. But many still rely on unmonitored inboxes, paper forms, static voicemail boxes, and outdated calendars.

Tools intended to create convenience often create fragmentation when they’re not connected to a unified workflow. A prospect might call your main line, submit a web form, and send a text message—all tracked in different systems, creating three separate incomplete records instead of one coherent client journey.

Firms with broken or unmonitored forms and phone lines face real penalties. Google Business Profile suspensions are increasingly tied to “unattended” or “dead-end” contact points—unanswered calls, unmonitored forms, broken chat features.

Practice-Area-Specific Challenges

Estate Planning

Estate planning clients expect clarity, warmth, and guidance. They’re often navigating complex family dynamics and significant decisions about legacy and protection. Confusion or slow follow-up immediately breaks the trust that’s essential to these relationships.

Multi-decision-maker dynamics are common—spouses, adult children, financial advisors may all be involved. Intake systems must accommodate these realities rather than treating every inquiry as a simple one-to-one transaction.

Elder Law

Elder law matters frequently involve adult children or caregivers initiating contact on behalf of an aging parent. Intake must gracefully capture multiple decision-makers and their respective roles.

Accessibility matters more here than in most practice areas. Consumer research shows that adults 45–75 are significantly less likely than younger groups to prefer digital-only interactions. Reliable, empathetic phone intake and straightforward scheduling are essential.

Heightened sensitivity to complexity and cognitive load means scripts must use plain language and confirm understanding. “Teach-back” questions (“Does this sound like what you’re looking for?”) are particularly powerful in this context.

Bankruptcy

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Bankruptcy clients are stressed, overwhelmed, and often ready to hire quickly once they’ve decided to take action. High urgency and emotional distress characterize these inquiries.

Speed-to-lead isn’t just helpful here—it’s decisive. The firm that offers fast intake, same-day or next-day consultations, and clear expectations captures the client. The firm that responds four hours later often loses them entirely.

Scripts that normalize distress and quickly assess urgency while offering clear next steps are critical for both conversion and long-term client satisfaction.

Financial Services Law

Financial law clients are acutely aware of data sensitivity. Privacy and security are front-of-mind concerns, governed by strict laws like GLBA that restrict how even review responses can reference financial details.

Complex fact patterns and longer decision cycles mean intake must balance thoroughness with convenience. Sloppy workflows—unsecured forms, unencrypted email—feel unsafe to these prospects and undermine trust before it has a chance to form.

What "Intake Rescue" Is and How It Works

Intake Rescue = A Framework for Speed, Clarity, and Conversion

Intake Rescue isn’t a product or a single technology solution. It’s a framework—a systematic approach to ensuring that every prospect who reaches out receives a response that builds trust, captures information, and moves them toward a consultation.

The framework has five interconnected components:

1. Visibility Check

Before you can fix intake, you need to understand it. This means auditing every channel where a potential client might make first contact: phone, web forms, chat, Local Service Ads, Google Business Profile, SMS, email.

The goal is mapping the actual first-contact experience—not the intended one. What happens when someone calls after hours? Where do web form submissions actually go? How quickly does someone respond to a GBP message?

Most firms are surprised by what this audit reveals.

2. Responsiveness Engineering

With visibility established, the next step is defining clear expectations: response-time targets by channel, ownership by role, routing rules, after-hours systems, and escalation workflows.

Your intake must operate like a business system—not casual communication.

This means explicit service-level agreements (target response within 10–15 minutes, including after hours with automation or backup coverage), clear ownership so inquiries don’t fall through cracks, and defined escalation paths when primary responders aren’t available.

The firms that respond first, respond clearly, and respond professionally are the firms that win.

Sirus Digital Tweet

3. Tool Integration and Automation

Modern intake requires connected systems. Your CRM, phone system, scheduling tool, review software, and intake forms should work together—sharing data, triggering notifications, and automating routine follow-up.

Automation handles routing, reminders, and data capture. Humans handle empathy, qualification, and conversion. The goal isn’t replacing human judgment; it’s ensuring that human judgment gets applied consistently to every qualified prospect.

4. Human + AI Collaboration

AI can meaningfully support intake—triaging basic information, routing inquiries, scheduling consultations, capturing data—but it should never make legal decisions or provide legal advice.

This distinction is critical. ABA Formal Opinion 512 and state bar guidance (including Florida’s Opinion 24-1) explicitly tie AI use in intake to duties of competence, confidentiality, and prospective-client rules. Chatbots must identify themselves clearly as automated tools, limit their function to fact-gathering and general information, and route anything involving strategy, predictions, or fee discussions to licensed attorneys.

Done well, AI extends your firm’s capacity without creating ethical exposure. Done poorly, it creates liability.

5. Compliance-First Architecture

Every element of your intake system must protect confidentiality, respect ethical boundaries, maintain advertising compliance, and document interactions appropriately.

State bar guidance on prospective clients (RPC 1.18) emphasizes that once someone shares information in response to an invitation to contact your firm, duties of confidentiality attach—even if no engagement occurs. Website forms, LSA lead forms, and chat widgets that explicitly invite case details likely create prospective-client duties.

A compliant intake process isn’t just safer—it’s more trustworthy. And in YMYL practice areas, that trust is the foundation of everything else.

Outcome-Based Case Studies

Case Study 1 — Estate and Elder Law Firm

The Situation

A three-attorney estate and elder law practice had strong SEO, a Google Business Profile rated above 4.6 stars, and consistent referral flow. By most measures, their marketing was working.

But something wasn’t connecting. Consultation volume had plateaued. Families who inquired often complained about unclear next steps. Call tracking revealed an uncomfortable truth: 35% of calls were going to voicemail, especially during lunch hours and after 4:30 p.m.

The firm had believed its intake was “fine.” The data told a different story.

The Intake Rescue Approach

The firm implemented several coordinated changes. They established structured intake scripts designed for multi-decision-maker families—acknowledging that estate planning often involves spouses, adult children, and sometimes financial advisors. They integrated their CRM with scheduling so that consultations could be booked during the initial call. They created an after-hours autoresponder that acknowledged inquiries and set clear expectations for next-day follow-up.

They also set explicit service standards: calls answered live from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., with after-hours inquiries triaged and consultations scheduled for the following day.

The Outcome

Within 90 days, the firm was scheduling 20 additional consultations per month. Missed-call rate dropped from 35% to under 8%. Review volume increased as the team began systematically requesting feedback after successful matters. Website visitor-to-consultation conversion improved measurably—without any increase in marketing spend.

The marketing had been working all along. The intake system just needed to catch what marketing was generating.

Case Study 2 — Bankruptcy Firm

The Situation

A two-attorney bankruptcy boutique relied heavily on Local Service Ads and Google Business Profile for lead generation. The channels were producing inquiries—but something was breaking down.

LSA reports showed numerous “unanswered” calls. Call tracking confirmed the pattern: high missed-call rates during evenings and weekends, with response delays averaging four to six hours for after-hours inquiries.

For bankruptcy clients—often stressed, overwhelmed, and ready to act—those delays were decisive. Prospects who called at 7 p.m. and didn’t hear back until the next morning had already contacted three other firms.

The Intake Rescue Approach

The firm added AI-supported virtual receptionist coverage after hours, using scripts specifically designed for urgency (“same-day relief options,” “stop garnishments”). They implemented automated text follow-up to LSA leads who didn’t answer a callback within five minutes. They created a dedicated bankruptcy intake landing page as the primary destination for GBP and LSA traffic, featuring a three-step screener and instant consultation scheduling.

The goal was simple: ensure that every high-intent lead received an immediate, professional response—regardless of when they reached out.

The Outcome

Lead-to-consultation conversion improved by 20–30%. Average time-to-first-contact fell from hours to minutes. LSA cost-per-retained-client dropped as fewer paid leads were wasted on slow responses.

The firm didn’t increase its marketing budget. It simply stopped losing the leads that marketing was already generating.

Case Study 3 — Financial Law Firm

The Situation

A niche financial law firm was concerned about compliance. Their intake process relied on PDF downloads and email replies—approaches that created both security risks and friction for prospects.

GLBA and state privacy requirements meant sensitive financial information couldn’t be casually exchanged via unencrypted email. But the alternatives felt cumbersome. Prospects often stalled or disappeared between initial inquiry and the financial disclosure that cases required.

The Intake Rescue Approach

The firm implemented a secure client portal with guided online intake questionnaires, accompanied by clear privacy statements explaining how data would be protected. They added an AI-assisted initial screening that asked only non-sensitive qualification questions before directing prospects to the secure portal.

Automated reminders and follow-ups in their CRM triggered when portal intake was incomplete, gently nudging prospects to finish the process.

The Outcome

Completion rates for financial disclosure forms improved significantly. Risk exposure from emailing sensitive information dropped to near zero. A clearer audit trail satisfied both regulators and professional liability insurers.

The firm created a more secure process that also happened to convert better—because prospects felt confident that their information was being handled professionally.

The Sirus Digital Intake Architecture

The "Four Touchpoints That Drive Trust" Model

Trust doesn’t begin when a prospect signs a retainer agreement. It begins at first contact—and it’s either built or broken at each subsequent interaction.

1. First Contact (Speed + Tone)

Your first impression is no longer your website. It’s your response time and the quality of that initial interaction.

A prompt, professional response signals competence. A delayed or fumbled response signals the opposite. The prospect is already forming judgments about what it would be like to be your client.

2. Clarity of Next Step (Scheduling Friction)

Confusion kills conversions. After every interaction, the prospect should know exactly what happens next—and that next step should be easy to take.

“We’ll be in touch” is not the next step. “I’m sending you a calendar link to schedule your consultation for Thursday or Friday—which works better?” is the next step.

3. Confidence Building (Follow-Up Cadence)

The period between first contact and consultation is fragile. Professional, warm reinforcement establishes trust and reduces no-shows.

Confirmation emails, reminder texts, preparatory materials—these touchpoints communicate that you’re organized, attentive, and prepared to help.

4. Conversion Path (Consultation → Retainer)

Your intake flow should align with your firm’s actual client journey. The questions you ask, the information you provide, and the expectations you set should all support the conversation that happens in the consultation room.

Intake isn’t separate from sales. It’s the foundation of sales.

The "Human-Layer + Automation-Layer" Blueprint

The most effective intake systems combine human expertise with technological consistency.

Automation handles what automation does well: routing inquiries to the right person, sending timely notifications, scheduling appointments, capturing data, triggering follow-up sequences, and ensuring nothing falls through the cracks.

Humans handle what humans do well: building rapport, demonstrating empathy, asking nuanced qualification questions, explaining complex processes, and making prospects feel heard and understood.

The goal isn’t efficiency for its own sake. It’s creating a scalable, high-trust intake ecosystem where every prospect receives both the consistency of good systems and the warmth of human attention.

How Firms Apply the Playbook

Step 1 — Perform an Intake Diagnostic

Start with a clear-eyed assessment of your current state.

Run a mystery shop across all channels—phone, web forms, chat, and GBP messaging. Document response times, tone, accuracy, and completion of next steps. Have someone unfamiliar with your firm call, submit a form, and send a message, then report back on the experience.

This becomes your baseline. You can’t improve what you haven’t measured.

To get some help organizing and executing an Intake Diagnostic, feel free to schedule a quick no-obligation call to review your firm’s current situation and opportunities.

Step 2 — Fix Speed-to-Lead

Aim for a 10–15 minute response window for all channels, including after hours.

This doesn’t mean attorneys must be available 24/7. It means having systems in place—autoresponders, smart routing, backup handlers—that ensure every inquiry receives a prompt, professional acknowledgment.

For phone calls, the standard is higher: live answer during business hours, with callbacks for missed calls within five minutes.

Step 3 — Deploy High-Trust Automation

Automate the mechanical parts of intake: call routing, form notifications, chat triage, follow-up sequences, data capture, and logging.

Your system should work even when your team is busy with other matters. Automation ensures consistency; humans provide the judgment and warmth that convert prospects into clients.

Ensure compliance guardrails are built in. Any AI or automated tools must identify themselves clearly and avoid anything that could be construed as legal advice.

Step 4 — Build Clear, Empathetic Intake Scripts

Scripts should accomplish four things: ask the right qualification questions, validate client concerns, explain next steps clearly, and reinforce trust.

Tailor scripts by practice area. A bankruptcy intake conversation requires a different language and pacing than an estate planning inquiry. The emotional register, the urgency signals, the reassurance needed—all vary by context.

Scripts aren’t about sounding robotic. They’re about ensuring that every intake conversation covers the essential elements while leaving room for human connection.

Step 5 — Integrate Scheduling and E-Signature

Make it easy for prospects to move forward immediately.

Research shows that 56% of clients expect online intake forms and e-signatures when hiring a law firm. Digital tools dramatically reduce drop-off between “I’m interested” and “I’m scheduled.”

Link your scheduling system to your intake workflow so that consultations can be booked in the same conversation—not in a follow-up email that may never get opened.

Step 6 — Track Intake KPIs

You can’t manage what you don’t measure. Establish ongoing tracking for the metrics that matter:

Missed-call rate (overall and by time-of-day)
Response time by channel
Consultation show rate
Conversion-by-channel (inquiry → consultation → retained)
Review velocity and response time

Data creates clarity. Clarity creates momentum. A monthly review of these metrics ensures continuous improvement rather than periodic crisis management.

For more information on measurables (especially how to work within Google’s EEAT & YMYL metrics), check out this post.

The Sirus Digital "Intake Rescue Roadmap"

Phase 1 — Assessment (Weeks 1–2)

Map your current intake flows across all channels. Test every contact point. Benchmark current KPIs. Identify the biggest gaps between your intended process and the actual prospect experience.

This phase is about understanding—clearly and honestly—where you are today.

Phase 2 — Intake Architecture Upgrade (Weeks 3–6)

Implement or reconfigure your CRM to centralize intake data. Integrate tools so that phone, web, chat, and scheduling all feed into a unified system. Build practice-area-specific intake scripts. Establish response-time SLAs. Configure automation for routing, notifications, and follow-up.

This phase is about building the infrastructure for consistent, professional intake.

Phase 3 — Conversion Optimization (Ongoing)

Refine scripts quarterly based on what you learn from actual conversations. Review KPIs monthly to identify emerging problems. Conduct periodic compliance checks to ensure your systems remain aligned with ethical requirements.

Intake isn’t a project with an end date. It’s an ongoing discipline—like client service itself.

While Intake Rescue addresses leaks in handling of Interest and Leads, be sure to check out Sirus Digital’s six-part “Where To Invest For Law Firm Marketing?” series.

Start with this post, which asks (and begins answering) that very question.

Intake Is Where Trust and Revenue Begin

The Real Competitive Advantage

In YMYL practice areas—estate planning, elder law, bankruptcy, and financial services—trust is everything.

And trust doesn’t begin on your website or in your consultation room. It begins the moment a prospective client reaches out and discovers whether your firm responds promptly, professionally, and with genuine attentiveness.

The firms that consistently respond first, respond clearly, and respond professionally are the firms that win. They earn more consultations, more positive reviews, more referrals, and more revenue—often without increasing their marketing spend by a single dollar.

Modern marketing doesn’t outperform bad intake. It magnifies its costs.

Intake isn’t a project with an end date. It’s an ongoing discipline.

Sirus Digital Tweet

Every dollar you invest in SEO, paid advertising, content marketing, and reputation management is ultimately filtered through your intake system. A firm with excellent marketing and broken intake watches its investment evaporate. A firm with solid marketing and excellent intake multiplies the return on every channel.

Today’s most successful law firms don’t just fix intake. They elevate it into a competitive advantage—a system that converts visibility into consultations and consultations into retained clients with predictable, measurable consistency.

Your Path Forward

If you’re ready to understand exactly where your intake is leaking—and what it will take to build a predictable, sustainable growth engine—request an Intake Rescue Audit.

It’s the most direct way to transform your marketing results without spending another dollar on advertising. Because the leads are already there. The question is whether your intake system is catching them.

References

At Sirus Digital, the Intake Rescue Playbook was developed through a rigorous research-synthesis process combining industry data, intake performance studies, consumer behavior benchmarks, and compliance guidelines. The insights in this post reflect an integrated review of third-party reports, independent research, and compiled data summaries.

The following reference links provide readers with direct access to the underlying materials used to inform the strategic recommendations in this article.

Operational Efficiency & Workflow / System Design

hear first when we share something New!

keep up-to-date on changes that affect your practice

More To Explore

digital marketing